Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMyraunet, Ingunn
dc.contributor.authorStrøm, Anita
dc.contributor.authorGjersøe, Heidi Moen
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T13:08:38Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T13:08:38Z
dc.date.created2023-10-16T12:24:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC). 2023, 23 (4), 1–11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-4156
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097043
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model has rapidly become a way of organising services for people with severe mental illness. FACT describes the integrated approach of interprofessional teams. Method: A qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in three FACT teams was conducted. Thirty observations of the teams’ board meetings were conducted, and field notes were thematically analysed. Results: This study generated three themes in interprofessional collaboration in FACT teams. The first theme reflects the challenges of working in line with the model, the second suggests an unclear understanding of a shared caseload, and the third shows different approaches to working with a shared caseload. Discussion: The themes suggest that there is increased opportunity for the shared caseload in the FACT team board meeting. The findings reflect that there is a lack of either the resources necessary for working with a shared caseload or an understanding of the intention of a shared caseload. Conclusion: The potential of the shared caseload in FACT team board meetings are dependent on sufficient resources and a collective understanding of the FACT model and the shared caseload among professionals. Further research on how a shared caseload is experienced and facilitated in FACT teams can provide insight into their practices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectTverrfaglig samarbeiden_US
dc.subjectCollaboration across the curriculumen_US
dc.subjectPsykisk helseen_US
dc.subjectPsykisk helseen_US
dc.subjectintegrated careen_US
dc.subjecthealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectFACTen_US
dc.subjectinterprofessional collaborationen_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.titleFrom model to everyday practice: A qualitative observational study of daily fact team board meetingsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s).en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Health sciences: 800en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC)en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/ijic.7555
dc.identifier.cristin2185103
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal