Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNortvedt, Line
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Cecilie Fromholt
dc.contributor.authorSjølie, Hege
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T11:41:34Z
dc.date.available2022-05-27T11:41:34Z
dc.date.created2022-03-24T15:32:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHealth Expectations. 2022, 1-14en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-6513
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2996453
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Young people need to be heard and take an active role in developing welfare services. When they are recognized as having skills and expertize, the advantages young people's involvement brings to both themselves and the organizations, are mobilization and empowering with impact on national decision‐making. Objective: To synthesize existing literature on how young people's involvement in coproduction can contribute to better welfare services. Search Strategy: We performed a systematic literature search in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cinahl). Inclusion Criteria: Publications whose abstracts contained themes as: Young people 12–25 years of age, receiving welfare, youth coproduction/involvement/participation and qualitative studies. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Of the 5469 documents retrieved, the full text of 58 studies was read, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria. A thematic synthesis following Thomas and Harden was used. Main Results: Young people being involved in coproduction of developing welfare services experienced to be valued and supported by partnerships, but they also pointed out deficiencies in welfare services. Some of the adolescents expressed not being listened to, lack of trusted relations and not being involved in policy making or prospects. The staff members saw some challenges with partnering with youth; as the need for flexibility, to keep the youth engaged and to purposefully meet the adolescents where they need help, guidance or resources. Conclusions: More involvement should be stressed. Coproduction is often symbolic more than resulting in real changes in the welfare services. Consequently, what is crucial when young people are involved is that they are encouraged by adults to be clear about the degree of involvement they want. Patient or Public Contribution: Patient and public involvement was not explicit in this review.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectyouthen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectsocial welfareen_US
dc.subjectsocial participationen_US
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectpatient participationen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.titleYoung peoples' involvement in welfare service development—Is voice enough?—A thematic synthesis of qualitative studiesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-14en_US
dc.source.journalHealth Expectationsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hex.13485
dc.identifier.cristin2012369
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal