Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAlfsvåg, Knut
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T11:45:17Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T11:45:17Z
dc.date.created2021-02-09T08:54:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSchriften der Luther-Agricola-Gesellschaft. 2020, 74 39-56.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1236-9675
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738138
dc.description.abstractCan humans know God? The possible answers to that question are yes and no, and then some variations in between. In my book What no mind has conceived I have tried to develop and defend the position that the fairly consistent answer of the Christian church to this question during the first thirteen hundred years of its history was a “no, at least not apart from his incarnational revelation.” The reasons for considering this as the basic answer are partly the insistence of divine unknowability among the biblical authors, partly the development of this position by the church fathers by means of the Neoplatonic idea of the unknowable One.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectGudsbildeen_US
dc.subjectThe image of Goden_US
dc.subjectDionysius Areopagitenen_US
dc.subjectDionysius the Areopagiteen_US
dc.subjectMartin Lutheren_US
dc.subjectMartin Lutheren_US
dc.title‘Duae res sunt Deus et Scriptura Dei’: On the relation between unknowability and clarity in the thought of Martin Lutheren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teologi: 151en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Theology: 151en_US
dc.source.pagenumber39-56en_US
dc.source.volume74en_US
dc.source.journalSchriften der Luther-Agricola-Gesellschaften_US
dc.identifier.cristin1887922
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel