Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMengshoel, Anne Marit
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Ingrid B
dc.contributor.authorMeeus, Mira
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Marrero, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorPheby, Derek
dc.contributor.authorStrand, Elin Bolle
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T11:22:53Z
dc.date.available2021-02-16T11:22:53Z
dc.date.created2020-05-23T18:42:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2020, 15 (1), 1-16en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-2623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2728339
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients find important in the treatment process. Methods: A scoping mixed methods literature review of European studies identified 16 papers fulfiling our inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesized separately in tables. Additionally, extracts from the qualitative studies were subjected to translational analysis. Results: Effect studies addressed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT, n = 4), multimodal rehabilitation (n = 2) and activity-pacing (n = 2). CBT reduced fatigue scores more than usual care or waiting list controls. The effects of rehabilitation and activity-pacing were inconsistent. The contents, assessment methods and effects of rehabilitation and activity pacing studies varied. For patients, health professionals’ recognition of ME/CFS and support were crucial, but they expressed ambiguous experiences of what the NPTs entail. Conclusions: Methodological differences make comparisons across NPTs impossible, and from a patient perspective the relevance of the specific contents of NPTs are unclear. Future well-designed studies should focus on developing NPTs tailored to patients’ concerns and evaluation tools reflecting what is essential for patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830
dc.subjectnon-pharmacological treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectpatient experiencesen_US
dc.subjecteffecten_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectactivity pacingen_US
dc.subjectcognitive behavioural therapyen_US
dc.subjectchronic fatigue syndromeen_US
dc.subjectsystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.subjectMyalgic encephalomyelitisen_US
dc.titlePatients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderOpen Accessen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-16en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-beingen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830
dc.identifier.cristin1812250
dc.relation.projectCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology): EU kodeen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel