Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMbakaya, B C
dc.contributor.authorKalembo, F W
dc.contributor.authorZgambo, M
dc.contributor.authorKonyani, Alice
dc.contributor.authorLungu, F
dc.contributor.authorTveit, Bodil
dc.contributor.authorKaasen, Anne
dc.contributor.authorSimango, Modesta
dc.contributor.authorBvumbwe, T
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T10:25:08Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T10:25:08Z
dc.date.created2020-10-08T17:06:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nursing. 2020, 19 (87), 1-14en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6955
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2681973
dc.description.abstractBackground: The clinical learning environment is an important part of the nursing and midwifery training as it helps students to integrate theory into clinical practice. However, not all clinical learning environments foster positive learning. This study aimed to assess the student nurses and midwives’ experiences and perception of the clinical learning environment in Malawi. Methods: A concurrent triangulation mixed methods research design was used to collect data from nursing and midwifery students. Quantitative data were collected using a Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, while qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory has six subscales of satisfaction, involvement, individualisation, innovation, task orientation and personalisation. The focus group interview guide had questions about clinical learning, supervision, assessment, communication and resources. Quantitative data were analysed by independent t-test and multivariate linear regression and qualitative data were thematically analysed. Results: A total of 126 participants completed the questionnaire and 30 students participated in three focus group discussions. Satisfaction subscale had the highest mean score (M = 26.93, SD = 4.82) while individualisation had the lowest mean score (M = 18.01, SD =3.50). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between satisfaction with clinical learning environment and personalization (β = 0.50, p = < 0.001), and task orientation (β =0.16 p = < 0.05). Teaching and learning resources, hostile environment, poor relationship with a qualified staff, absence of clinical supervisors, and lack of resources were some of the challenges faced by students in their clinical learning environment. Conclusion: Although satisfaction with clinical learning environment subscale had the highest mean score, nursing and midwifery students encountered multifaceted challenges such as lack of resources, poor relationship with staff and a lack of support from clinical teachers that negatively impacted on their clinical learning experiences. Training institutions and hospitals need to work together to find means of addressing the challenges by among others providing resources to students during clinical placement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectmidwiferyen_US
dc.subjectstudentsen_US
dc.subjectsatisfactionen_US
dc.subjectlearningen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectsykepleieen_US
dc.subjectjordmødreen_US
dc.subjectlæringen_US
dc.titleNursing and midwifery students’ experiences and perception of their clinical learning environment in Malawi: a mixedmethod studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderOpen Accessen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-14en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Nursingen_US
dc.source.issue87en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00480-4
dc.identifier.cristin1838293
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel