Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrand, Elin Bolle
dc.contributor.authorNacul, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMengshoel, Anne Marit
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Ingrid B
dc.contributor.authorGrabowski, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorKrumina, Angelika
dc.contributor.authorAlegre, Jose
dc.contributor.authorEfrim, Magdalena
dc.contributor.authorSekulic, Slobodan
dc.contributor.authorPheby, Derek
dc.contributor.authorSakkas, Giorgos
dc.contributor.authorSirbu, Carmen Adella
dc.contributor.authorAuthier, Jerome
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T13:58:43Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T13:58:43Z
dc.date.created2019-12-12T12:05:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. 2019, 14 (12), 1-12.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2633989
dc.description.abstractME/CFS is a chronic, complex, multisystem disease that often limits the health and functioning of the affected patients. Diagnosing patients with ME/CFS is a challenge, and many different case definitions exist and are used in clinical practice and research. Even after diagnosis, medical treatment is very challenging. Symptom relief and coping may affect how patients live with their disease and their quality of life. There is no consensus on which diagnostic criteria should be used and which treatment strategies can be recommended for patients. The purpose of the current project was to map the landscape of the Euromene countries in respect of national guidelines and recommendations for case definition, diagnosis and clinical approaches for ME/CFS patients. A 23 items questionnaire was sent out by email to the members of Euromene. The form contained questions on existing guidelines for case definitions, treatment/management of the disease, tests and questionnaires applied, and the prioritization of information for data sampling in research. We obtained information from 17 countries. Five countries reported having national guidelines for diagnosis, and five countries reported having guidelines for clinical approaches. For diagnostic purposes, the Fukuda criteria were most often recommended, and also the Canadian Consensus criteria, the International Consensus Criteria and the Oxford criteria were used. A mix of diagnostic criteria was applied within those countries having no guidelines. Many different questionnaires and tests were used for symptom registration and diagnostic investigation. For symptom relief, pain and anti-depressive medication were most often recommended. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Graded Exercise treatment were often recommended as disease management and rehabilitative/palliative strategies. The lack of consistency in recommendations across European countries urges the development of regulations, guidance and standards. The results of this study will contribute to the harmonization of diagnostic criteria and treatment for ME/CFS in Europe.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencenb_NO
dc.subjectME/CFSnb_NO
dc.subjectdiagnosisnb_NO
dc.subjecttreatmentnb_NO
dc.subjectchronic fatigue syndromenb_NO
dc.subjectmyalgic encephalomyelitisnb_NO
dc.titleMyalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Investigating care practices pointed out to disparities in diagnosis and treatment across European Unionnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holderOpen Accessnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-12nb_NO
dc.source.volume14nb_NO
dc.source.journalPLoS ONEnb_NO
dc.source.issue12nb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225995
dc.identifier.cristin1759969
cristin.unitcode251,3,0,0
cristin.unitnameFakultet for helsefag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel