dc.contributor.author | Love, Beverly | |
dc.contributor.author | Vetere, Arlene Louise | |
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-12T11:13:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-12T11:13:32Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-07-07T09:19:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Institute for Qualitative Methodology. 2019, 18, 1-9 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 1609-4069 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2607909 | |
dc.description.abstract | Conducting qualitative field research involving drug users within a politicized criminal justice setting presents a unique set of ethical, legal, and safeguarding concerns and quandaries for researchers. There is a paucity of qualitative research with community-based drug-using offenders who form part of the UK Government (England and Wales) criminal justice strategies (Senker and Green; Hucklesby and Wincup). Hodgson, Parker, and Seddon highlighted this group as an emerging study population. This article aims to provide a more recent contribution covering the difficulties of accessing and researching with a hard to reach and politicized criminal justice drug-using population, such as risks of re-traumatization, risk assessment, safeguarding, criminal disclosure, and personal safety. The first author reflects on her research from her own unique political position as a policy advisor to the UK Government on criminal justice drug policy, with a view to providing recommendations for research with a hard to reach and hidden population who represent a marginalized group. The combination of reflexivity in research and the use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis as a research methodology proved helpful in addressing and overcoming some of these ethical, political, and other quandaries. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | International Institute for Qualitative Methodology | nb_NO |
dc.subject | ethics | nb_NO |
dc.subject | safeguarding | nb_NO |
dc.subject | qualitative research | nb_NO |
dc.subject | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis | nb_NO |
dc.subject | reflexivity | nb_NO |
dc.subject | drug users | nb_NO |
dc.subject | criminal justice system | nb_NO |
dc.subject | offenders | nb_NO |
dc.subject | etikk | nb_NO |
dc.subject | rusmisbrukere | nb_NO |
dc.subject | strafferettssystem | nb_NO |
dc.title | Handling “Hot Potatoes”: ethical, legal, safeguarding, and political quandaries of researching drug-using offenders | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.rights.holder | Open Access | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 1-9 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 18 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | International Journal of Qualitative Methods | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | January - December | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1609406919859713 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1710487 | |
cristin.unitcode | 251,2,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Fakultet for sosialfag | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |