Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThomassen, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorEspeland, Ansgar
dc.contributor.authorSofteland, Eirik
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Hans Morten
dc.contributor.authorHeltne, Jon-Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBrattebø, Guttorm
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-10T12:48:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-10T12:48:16Z
dc.date.created2012-01-05T12:37:46Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2011, 19 , 1-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2657586
dc.description.abstractBackground: Checklists are common in some medical fields, including surgery, intensive care and emergency medicine. They can be an effective tool to improve care processes and reduce mortality and morbidity. Despite the seemingly rapid acceptance and dissemination of the checklist, there are few studies describing the actual process of developing and implementing such tools in health care. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences from checklist development and implementation in a group of non-medical, high reliability organisations (HROs). Method: A qualitative study based on key informant interviews and field visits followed by a Delphi approach. Eight informants, each with 10-30 years of checklist experience, were recruited from six different HROs. Results: The interviews generated 84 assertions and recommendations for checklist implementation. To achieve checklist acceptance and compliance, there must be a predefined need for which a checklist is considered a well suited solution. The end-users ("sharp-end") are the key stakeholders throughout the development and implementation process. Proximity and ownership must be assured through a thorough and wise process. All informants underlined the importance of short, self-developed, and operationally-suited checklists. Simulation is a valuable and widely used method for training, revision, and validation. Conclusion: Checklists have been a cornerstone of safety management in HROs for nearly a century, and are becoming increasingly popular in medicine. Acceptance and compliance are crucial for checklist implementation in health care. Experiences from HROs may provide valuable input to checklist implementation in healthcare.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Care–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectChecklist–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectQuality Assuranceen_US
dc.subjectCulture–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectModelsen_US
dc.subjectChecklist–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Culture–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectInterviews As Topic–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectHumans–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectDelphi Technique–Standardsen_US
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care–Standardsen_US
dc.titleImplementation of checklists in health care; learning from high-reliability organisationsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Traumatologi: 783en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Traumatology: 783en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7-?en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1757-7241-19-53
dc.identifier.cristin877634
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel