Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAngell, Olav Helge
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T09:31:01Z
dc.date.available2024-04-05T09:31:01Z
dc.date.created2017-01-31T18:54:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDiaconia. Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice. 2016, 7 (2), 142-158.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1869-3261
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3125029
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article is to investigate the relationship between diakonia and innovationin the field of provision of welfare services. Special interest is therefore vested in studyingthe role of the third sector more generally. Traditionally, this sector and its organisationshave been considered the most important actors for innovation in welfare services provi-sion, as pioneers in this field of services. The investigation has laid open a rather complexfield. Theories and models drawn from several fields of study, including welfare state the-ory and social policy theory, are used in the analysis of the relationship. A constructivistapproach to social problems, combined with approaches to functions of third sector andfaith-based human service organisations have helped us create a picture of the subject ofinvestigation. The article provides elements to an analytic framework for empirical studiesof how diakonia, through its organised actors, can influence public problem processes andinnovations in welfare services, connected with political processes that may stimulate andinspire innovations in the public sector as well as other sectors – or hamper them. Potentialrisk factors, both political, financial and moral, are identified that may have an impact oninnovation in welfare service organisations in civil society, including diaconal actors. Faith-based welfare service organisations possess moral resources in terms of the basic ideologyand moral values. These resources may serve to stimulate innovations to improve the life ofthe people the organisations serve, as foundations for critical participation in public debateon social problems and welfare services innovation, but also for organisational change intothe opposite of innovation, making lives more miserable for users of the organisations in-stead of better.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherVandenhoeck & Ruprechten_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectmoral resourcesen_US
dc.subjectwelfarestateen_US
dc.subjectthird sectoren_US
dc.subjectservice innovationen_US
dc.subjectsocial policyen_US
dc.subjectsocial problemsen_US
dc.subjectdiakoniaen_US
dc.titleDiakonia as innovation: A political and organisational perspectiveen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingenen_US
dc.source.pagenumber142-158en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.journalDiaconia. Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practiceen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.13109/diac.2016.7.2.142
dc.identifier.cristin1444273
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal