Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGuelmami, Noomen
dc.contributor.authorFekih-Romdhane, Feten
dc.contributor.authorGhouili, Hatem
dc.contributor.authorJelleli, Hilmi
dc.contributor.authorRebhi, Mahmood
dc.contributor.authorSaidane, Mouna
dc.contributor.authorBouzouraa, Mohamed Mansour
dc.contributor.authorNoureddine, Ghennam
dc.contributor.authorBen Aissa, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.contributor.authorDergaa, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T08:28:38Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T08:28:38Z
dc.date.created2024-02-15T10:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationCogent Social Sciences. 2024, 10 (1), 1-15en_US
dc.identifier.issn2331-1886
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3124310
dc.description.abstractNo arabic version of the Revised cognitive-affective Mindfulness Scale (caMS-R) was found, prompting this study’s threefold objectives: first, to validate an arabic translation of caMS-R among tunisian students; second, to assess its factor structure and reliability; and third, to explore its validity by investigating the relationship between caMS-R scores, grit, and academic success. cross-sectional online data were collected from 705 university physical education students (mean age 21.62 ± 1.38 years) in two distinct time periods, with participants divided into exploratory and confirmatory samples. the 12-item caMS-R scale underwent both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (cFa), confirming a second-order structure (χ2 (53) = 77.997, p = 0.014; χ2/df = 1.47; comparative fit index (cFi) = 0.995; cFi = 0.994; RMSea (90% confidence interval [ci] 0–0.013–0.042) = 0.029. Strong internal consistency was indicated by cronbach α indices ranging from 0.865 to 0.880 for all subscales. Results from Roccurve analysis revealed the arabic caMS-R’s ability to distinguish effectively between students with low and high-grade point averages (gPa; area under the curve [aUc] = 0.782, ci 95%: 0.726–0.838, p < 0.001), confirming its sensitivity. convergent and discriminant validity were supported by the average variance extracted (aVe) of the four scale factors and adherence to the Fornell and larcker discriminant validity criterion. additionally, caMS-R scores displayed positive associations with gPa and grit scores, establishing the concurrent validity of the scale. in conclusion, these findings collectively suggest that the arabic version of caMS-R is a recommended self-report assessment tool for mindfulness in tunisia and other arabic countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCogent OAen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectarabicen_US
dc.subjectpsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.subjectgriten_US
dc.subjectstudentsen_US
dc.subjectCognitive-Affective Mindfulness Scaleen_US
dc.subjectmindfulnessen_US
dc.titleCross-cultural adaptation and validation of an arabic version of the cognitive-affective mindfulness scale (CAMS-R)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-15en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalCogent Social Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23311886.2024.2306919
dc.identifier.cristin2246266
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal