Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBertelli, Davide
dc.contributor.authorErdal, Marta Bivand
dc.contributor.authorCosciug, Anatolie
dc.contributor.authorKussy, Angelina
dc.contributor.authorMikiewicz, Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorSzulecki, Kacper
dc.contributor.authorTulbure, Corina
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T12:48:32Z
dc.date.available2023-01-05T12:48:32Z
dc.date.created2022-12-02T12:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCentral and Eastern European Migration Review. 2022, 11 (2) 53-67en_US
dc.identifier.issn2300-1682
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041251
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.description.abstractMigrants’ property ownership in their countries of origin is often understood through the prism of return: both intended and actual return mobilities. Applying a transnational optic, this article unpacks the relationships between migrants’ property ownership ‘back home’ and their reflections on future moves and stays, not limited to possible return. We draw on 80 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2020 with Polish and Romanian migrants living in Barcelona and Oslo. They left their homeland, sometimes following domestic migration or international migration to other countries, before arriving in Spain and Norway. Based on these case studies of East–West migration within Europe, we contribute to work recognising the ongoing complex and diversified nature of mobilities in Europe. First, we detail what migrants’ property ownership looks like in practice – forms of ownership, types of property, location. Second, we focus on how owning property in Poland or Romania intersects with migrants’ considerations about moving or staying in the future, beyond return. Considerations about future (im)mobility shed light on transnational relationships, as these evolve over time and across space. Furthermore, we find that transnational property ownership in their countries of origin reveals much about migrants’ relations with people and places ‘back home’ and reflects the known non-linearity of migration stories. Overall, however, transnational property ownership is a poor predictor of both return plans and intentions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCentre of Migration Research, University of Warsaw, and Polish Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectRomaniaen_US
dc.subjectPolanden_US
dc.subjecttimeen_US
dc.subjectlifecourseen_US
dc.subjectpropertyen_US
dc.subject(im)mobilityen_US
dc.subjectreturnen_US
dc.titleLiving here, owning there? Transnational property ownership and migrants’ (Im)mobility considerations byond returnen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber53-67en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalCentral and Eastern European Migration Reviewen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.54667/ceemr.2022.09
dc.identifier.cristin2087714
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 287738en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal