Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZlamal, Jaroslav
dc.contributor.authorGjevjon, Edith Roth
dc.contributor.authorFossum, Mariann
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Marianne Trygg
dc.contributor.authorSteindal, Simen Alexander
dc.contributor.authorStrandell-Laine, Camilla
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Marie Hamilton
dc.contributor.authorNes, Andrea Aparecida Gonçalves
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T10:43:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-17T10:43:15Z
dc.date.created2022-06-13T13:37:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJMIR Nursing. 2022, 5 (1), e37380, 1-13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3012314
dc.descriptionOriginally published in JMIR Nursing (https://nursing.jmir.org), 07.06.2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Nursing, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://nursing.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. URL: https://nursing.jmir.org/2022/1/e37380en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nursing education has increasingly focused on critical thinking among nursing students, as critical thinking is a desired outcome of nursing education. Particular attention is given to the potential of technological tools in guiding nursing students to stimulate the development of critical thinking; however, the general landscape, facilitators, and challenges of these guidance models remain unexplored, and no previous mixed methods systematic review on the subject has been identified. Objective: This study aims to synthesize existing evidence on technology-supported guidance models used in nursing education to stimulate the development of critical thinking in nursing students in clinical practice. Methods: This mixed methods systematic review adopted a convergent, integrated design to facilitate thematic synthesis. This study followed the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Results: We identified 3 analytical themes: learning processes implemented to stimulate critical thinking, organization of the learning process to stimulate critical thinking, and factors influencing the perception of the learning process. We also identified 4 guidance models, all based on facilitator or preceptorship models using tailored instructional or learning strategies and one or several technological tools that were either generic or custom-made for specific outcomes. The main facilitators of these technology-supported guidance models were nurse educators or nurse preceptors, and the main challenges in using technology-supported guidance models were the stress associated with technical difficulties or increased cognitive load. Conclusions: Although we were able to identify 4 technology-supported guidance models, our results indicate a research gap regarding the use of these models in nursing education, with the specific aim of stimulating the development of critical thinking. Both nurse preceptors and nurse educators play a crucial role in the development of critical thinking among nursing students, and technology is essential for such development. However, technology-supported guidance models should be supervised to mitigate the associated stress.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJMIR Publications Inc.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectclinical practiceen_US
dc.subjectnursing educationen_US
dc.subjecttechnologyen_US
dc.subjectguidance modelsen_US
dc.subjectcritical thinkingen_US
dc.titleTechnology-supported guidance models stimulating the development of critical thinking in clinical practice: Mixed methods systematic reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder©Jaroslav Zlamal, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Mariann Fossum, Marianne Trygg Solberg, Simen A Steindal, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Marie Hamilton Larsen, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-13en_US
dc.source.volume5en_US
dc.source.journalJMIR Nursingen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/37380
dc.identifier.cristin2031435
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal